Adaptive Voxel Importance Prediction for Rapid Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

Main Article Content

Khadijah M. Hanga
Maryam Alka

Abstract

Large-scale inverse optimisation remains a practical bottleneck in online adaptive radiotherapy, where treatment replanning must be completed within minutes. Existing voxel-reduction methods can accelerate optimisation, but many rely on patient-specific probing or hand-crafted heuristics before each plan. This work presents AdaVIP, an extension of the voxel-importance framework of Mair et al. that replaces iterative probing with one-pass voxel-importance prediction. AdaVIP combines frozen nnU-Net anatomical features with compact physics-informed descriptors to rank voxels for reduced optimisation. Stochastic inverse-probability weighting preserves the target objective in expectation for the sampling stage, while post-sampling safeguards improve coverage of clinically critical regions. Across prostate, liver, and head-and-neck planning cohorts, AdaVIP reduces planning time by about sevenfold relative to full optimisation while keeping major dose–volume histogram endpoints within predefined clinical equivalence margins. The method adds less than one second of inference time and preserves compatibility with the downstream convex optimisation workflow. 

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biographies

Khadijah M. Hanga

Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7XG, United Kingdom

Maryam Alka

School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

References

Archambault, Y., Boylan, C., van Beek, S., Bissonnette, J.-P., & et al. (2023). Clinical implementation of an online adaptive radiotherapy system. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 4(1), e13982.

Bortfeld, T. (2006). IMRT: A review and preview. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51(13), R363–R379.

Breedveld, S., Storchi, P. R. M., & Heijmen, B. J. M. (2017). Stochastic constraint sampling for non-convex optimization in radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62(23), N407–N423.

Byrne, M., Archibald-Heeren, B., Hu, Y., & et al. (2022). Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Early clinical experience. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 67(1), 015016.

Craft, D., Bangert, M., Long, T., Papp, D., & Unkelbach, J. (2014). Shared data for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization research: The CORT dataset. Medical Physics, 41(8), 081703.

Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021). nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature Methods, 18, 203–211.

Mair, S., Fu, A., & Sjölund, J. (2024). Efficient radiation treatment planning based on voxel importance. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 69(16), 165014.

Nelissen, K. J., Versteijne, E., Senan, S., & et al. (2023). Same-day adaptive palliative radiotherapy without prior CT simulation. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 182, 109538.

Romeijn, H. E., Ahuja, R. K., Dempsey, J. F., & Kumar, A. (2003). A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Operations Research, 54(2), 201–216.

Shepard, D. M., Olivera, G. H., Reckwerdt, P. J., & Mackie, T. R. (1999). Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomographic radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 44(10), 2541–2557.

Sibolt, P., Gustafsson, C., Cronholm, A., & et al. (2024). Clinical experience with daily online adaptive radiotherapy using ethos. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, 29, 100241.

Ungun, B., Xing, L., & Boyd, S. (2019). Real-time radiation treatment planning with optimality guarantees via cluster and bound methods. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 31(3), 544–558.